Picture an apartment building in a city that gets almost all
of its electricity from nuclear power stations. It has solar panels and a gas
powered generator.
The power lines from the utility are only connected to the
ventilation fan that runs continuously at the same power level. A gas powered generator
heats and cools the building via a heat pump in addition to powering lights and
appliances. The constant current flow from the nuclear power station to the ventilation
fan is the building's baseload electrical energy need.
On sunny periods of sunny days, the generator output
decreases because the panels are providing electricity. The panels are acting
as fuel (and emissions) reduction devices for the generator.
The owner is very concerned about climate change and wants
to minimize emissions. One day, a stranger knocks at the apartment owner's door
and tells her she should disconnect from the nuclear power and add more solar
panels because, ah, sunshine is free. So she does but soon finds that the gas
bill and attendant emissions are higher than they used to be.
Why is that? Because the solar energy was often produced when not needed (nobody was home) and
was wasted. Adding more solar panels didn't change when they produced power, it only increased how much was wasted when they did produce power. The extra
panels displaced what nuclear had been providing but only when they were producing power for part of sunny days, which is why
they were never able to reduce gas flows to the level seen when the ventilation
fan was being continuously powered with nuclear 24 hours a day, every day.
The stranger returns yet again and tells her to add batteries
to store the wasted solar. Alas, this city is located where there is very
little sun for months at a time and the cost of having enough batteries to
store months worth of energy (called seasonal storage) is twice the value of
their entire apartment complex (this is actually the case with my home).
Because the addition of more solar panels did not lower the
emissions to the level seen when there was a ventilation fan running on nuclear
power, the owner reconnected it to the grid and sold the extra panels on
Craigslist.
The apartment owner eventually learned that the stranger who
she had assumed was a power systems engineer, was actually the pizza delivery
guy, who having been imprinted at an impressionable age with antinuclear dogma,
had been parroting things he had read on the internet but didn't really
understand.
The End
This story is an analogy to explain how a real power grid works and why emissions rise when nuclear is removed from it. It also demonstrates that a grid is composed of many players and they all have different costs. Assuming that the solar panels were the cheapest to install and operate, you still could not eliminate the other, more expensive players because intermittent sources like wind and solar can't do the job alone. To minimize emissions a grid must minimize fossil fuel use. Using wind and solar as fuel reduction devices to minimize the use of natural gas in load following and peaking power stations and using nuclear for baseload instead of coal could rapidly decarbonize our grid.
The story is also a warning that we shouldn't be taking advice from the fry cooks, journalism, and philosophy majors out there writing articles about a complex topic like power engineering.
The story is also a warning that we shouldn't be taking advice from the fry cooks, journalism, and philosophy majors out there writing articles about a complex topic like power engineering.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are not respectful of other participants will be deleted, so don't waste your time on a post that will be canned. Feel free to post links to pertinent sources and to your own website as part of your comment. Spam disguised as a comment will also be deleted as will comments that consist primarily of copied and pasted words from other authors (plagiarized content).