Touch here for mobile friendly version

Monday, May 25, 2009

HSA, the future of fusion (solar) power



Replacing all of the electricity used in a typical home with photovoltaic panels is presently not cost effective--too expensive. We use too much electricity. The panels cost too much. But there is another way to look at residential solar. Installing just enough panels to offset your refrigerator and dryer can be viewed as a fancy refrigerator or dryer system. Two of your biggest electricity hogs can essentially become zero fossil energy use appliances.

This is something you will be envied for. Compared to driving a gas hog SUV for show or a poseur pickup truck, this idea, let's call it hybrid solar appliances, or HSA, is an example of an environmentally benign status symbol. Sure they will be pricey, but so are the industrial sized stainless steel ranges, fridges, dishwashers, and the granite countertops found in today's $40,000 (on average) designer kitchens.

The panels will have about twice the lifespan of a typical appliance and by the time you have to replace them in twenty years or so, they will cost a fraction of what you paid for your first ones. I use the word hybrid a lot because, like the word bio, it creates a warm fuzzy feeling in most people.



The concept can be extended to your water heater. Solar hot water panels supplementing your hot water tank can be viewed as one fancy hot water appliance, again driving one of your biggest energy hogs to close to zero fossil energy. Solar panels are very visible and therefor make excellent status displays. You can also put the controller in your parlor to entertain and impress guests.

That pretty much leaves things like lights, computers, and various phantom loads. It's easy and cheap to radically reduce the power used by these things. Replace incandescent lights with curly bulbs, or curly bulbs with much more expensive diode bulbs. Use sensors to control many lights and use timers on fans. There are all kinds of smart power strips available now that will turn off your various charger transformers when not in use. There's even a widget that will power down your computer when it detects you have departed.

Another way to view grid-tied residential solar is that, as far as the power company is concerned, it's equivalent to turning off electric appliances. They can't make money off you if you don't use their product.

The latest solar power plants are using concentrated solar rays to create molten salts that are stored for later use to heat steam to turn turbines that spin generators to make electricity. They can generate electricity for extended periods of time when the sun isn't shining.

Studies have shown that with a properly designed electric grid, wind and solar power can be combined to keep the lights on because when the sun isn't shining the wind is always blowing somewhere, or vice versa.

I just read an article in Science, which mentioned that load-peaking natural gas power plants are now more expensive than solar:



A power plant using natural gas can be quickly fired up or shut down to provide extra electricity when needed, like say on hot sunny days when airconditioners are being used. Coal fired plants cannot easily be turned off and on because it takes a lot of effort and expense to get the coal burning. They are designed to run continuously.

The sun is a giant fusion reaction. The future will be determined by how efficiently we capture its power. I will be cutting my home's electric use in the coming months and will keeping readers abreast of developments and projects.

Click here to see a list of my articles and to subscribe to future posts

(photo credits frielp and The Lebers via the Flickr Creative Commons license).

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Ladies and gentlemen ...start your engines!



I grew up in Indianapolis where the Indy 500 was a spring ritual. Tomorrow will be the first time in three-quarters of a century that the race won't be listened to on the radio by my mother, who passed away just before Christmas.

I have three memories that stand out. The most recent was the time I worked as a high-school student in a hot dog stand to earn money for a service club. It was the only time I attended the race and I could only catch a glimpse of the cars during breaks because the stand was located in the back of the stadium. The next memory was the time one of the cars used a jet turbine. It was tearing up the track until the transmission blew up. My earliest memory goes all the way back to the day when two drivers were burned alive.

Some changes were made after that. For safety reasons it was decided that the cars would use smaller gas tanks and they would be filled with methanol instead of gasoline. Methanol was chosen because it's easy to put out with small amounts of water. According to the Methanol Institue:

"…If an engine fire develops in a methanol-fueled Indy race car, the pit crew simply pours water on the fire to put it out. Normally, the car is able to get back in the race in a matter of seconds…."



Here is a video of a fire started at the Gold Coast Indy race using methanol where a driver pulled out of the pit with the fuel hose still attached. The pit crew just dosed each other with buckets of water. There were no injuries.

The fuel was switched from methanol to ethanol in 2007 and it wasn't for safety reasons. Tom Slunecka, at the time executive director of the Ethanol Promotion and Information Council representing corn ethanol interests put it this way:

"…We could have put our name on the side of a car to promote ethanol, but instead we did it the hard way, so we arranged this fuel switch…."

In comparison, a pit crew member was seriously burned last year when a car using ethanol pulled out of the pit with the fuel hose still attached during an American Le Mans series race:

"…Safety workers quickly put out the fire, but not before Jones, wearing a helmet and fire-retardant clothing, was briefly caught up in the flames.
The hospital confirmed his condition and that he is in the intensive care unit, but would not disclose the nature or severity of his injuries…."


Update 2/5/2011 Look at this Indy car ethanol fire!



The following video demonstrates how hard it is to put out an ethanol fire (885 gallons is the equivalent of two hot tubs):



According to The Bulletin:

"…Ethanol presents firefighters with several unique challenges. For instance, ethanol fires cannot be put out with water; instead, they must be smothered with the careful application of alcohol-resistant foams…"

This stuff really burns as witnessed by this video documenting a tanker that turned over.

Let's hope it is a safe race this year. I'll be listening on the radio one last time in memory of my mom.

Click here to see a list of my articles and to subscribe to future posts

(photo credit BSquared AKA Family Paparazzi via the Flickr Creative Commons license).

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

I apologize

This post has nothing to do with environmental or conservation issues. I just wanted to share. The last sentence spoken in this video is priceless.



Click here to see a list of my articles and to subscribe to future posts

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Biofuel Myths



Biofuel myth posts are a dime a dozen. I thought it was time to do one of my own. Bookmark this post to use the next time you encounter a biofuel missionary or a member of the congregation in a comment field. This will be a work in progress. I'll be adding myths as I encounter them. Feel free to let me know of any you see or if you would like me to try to debunk one.

The only way out of our liquid fuel dilemma is for the public to start embracing the rapidly emerging new technologies that radically improve gas mileage 100% or more above our national average and radically improved mass transit for those who want to use it. Converting food into fuel is a financially and environmentally futile waste of money and resources. Educate your politicians. Send them an irate email.

I call these items myths but they might more accurately be described as Big Biofuel talking points. Every myth can be traced back to one of the dozens of websites that promote crop-based biofuels in the name of profit.

The people you find parroting these "facts" on Internet comment fields in defense of crop-based biofuels fall into two basic groups. People who make a living from crop-based biofuels and those who have been duped by same who might think they came up with these talking points on their own, but the "fact" that they all say the same things strongly suggests otherwise. We are all susceptible to being duped by things like car ads and this is no exception. Car ads are one thing, propaganda is another but they are both effective on the unwary and uncritical. Click here to continue.

Click here to see a list of my articles and to subscribe to future posts

(photo credit Mike Licht via the Flickr Creative Commons license).

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Hybrid electric bike …with afterburners



In honor of national Bike to Work Week, I shot some helmet cam footage of my hybrid bike in action. Hills and cars are the bane of bikers everywhere. One problem at a time I always say.

Click here to see a list of my articles and to subscribe to future posts.